607 BCE
| Category | Jehovah’s Witnesses |
|---|---|
| Record type | Doctrine |
| Editorial status | Documentary term explained from a Catholic standpoint |
| Authority | Definition only; inclusion confers no religious authority |
Definition and ordinary meaning
The Watch Tower date for Jerusalem’s destruction used as the starting point for the 1914 calculation.
Historical setting
The term belongs to changing Bible Student and Watch Tower teaching under Russell, Rutherford and the later Governing Body. Earlier predictions and later reinterpretations must be compared rather than merged.
Meaning within the tradition
Within Jehovah’s Witnesses, 607 BCE must be read according to the school, source and period that uses it. The same word may name a text, rite, institution or doctrine in more than one sense. This article therefore resists treating a later standardized definition as though it were present unchanged from the beginning.
Natural-philosophical and historical assessment
The claim must be defined before it is compared. Reason asks whether its account of reality, causality, personhood, moral obligation and final end is coherent; history asks when it appears and what evidence supports it. A later assertion cannot overturn earlier public evidence without proportionate proof.
Catholic judgement and necessary distinctions
Catholic judgement rejects the Watch Tower’s denial of the Trinity, the created-Christ doctrine, failed chronological claims and organizational claim to exclusive authority. The biblical name of God cannot be used to overturn the divinity of the Son, the personality of the Holy Ghost or the visible bodily Resurrection.
Primary texts and source control
Read the term first in the earliest available source and then in later school or institutional definitions. The following local routes keep documentary evidence separate from commentary.